蛙源与鱼源无乳链球菌的遗传分化、基因分型、毒力谱、耐药性与致病性比较研究

    Comparative studies on genetic differentiation, genotyping, virulence profiles, drug resistance and pathogenicity of Streptococcus agalactiae of frog and fish origin

    • 摘要:
      目的 探究不同宿主来源的无乳链球菌(Streptococcus agalactiae)在生物学特性、分子分型及对牛蛙致病性方面的差异,为水产病害防控提供理论依据。
      方法 选取5株蛙源菌株黑斑蛙(Pelophylax nigromaculatus)1株,14#;牛蛙(Rana catesbeiana)4株,分别为19#、20#、24#、25#及2株尼罗罗非鱼(Oreochromis niloticus)源菌株(TW2018-78、TW2021-21),结合16S rRNA系统发育分析及cfb基因检测进行种属鉴定;进一步开展生长特性分析、荚膜多糖(CPS)血清分型、多位点序列分型(MLST)、毒力与耐药基因检测,并通过人工回归感染实验评估不同宿主来源无乳链球菌对牛蛙的致病性。
      结果 7株菌株均鉴定为无乳链球菌;系统发育分析显示,蛙源与尼罗罗非鱼源菌株分属不同进化支。蛙源菌株均为Ib-ST261型,最适生长温度为28 ℃,溶血性及协同溶血实验(CAMP)均为阴性;尼罗罗非鱼源菌株为Ia-ST7型,在37 ℃生长良好,β-溶血和CAMP实验均为阳性。人工回归感染实验显示,蛙源菌株(25#)对牛蛙致病性强,而尼罗罗非鱼源菌株未致病。毒力基因分析显示,蛙源菌株普遍携带cfbhylBsip基因,部分携带bibAfbsB基因,均缺失cylEbca基因;尼罗罗非鱼源菌株毒力基因谱更完整。耐药基因检测显示,蛙源菌株仅携带ermA基因;尼罗罗非鱼源菌株携带ermAsul1qnrSpbp2x等多种耐药基因,且存在基因型与表型不一致现象。
      结论 不同宿主来源的无乳链球菌在遗传型别、生理特性、毒力因子、耐药性及致病力等方面差异显著,提示其可能具有宿主适应性。本研究结果为水产养殖无乳链球菌的精准防控提供依据。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective This study aims to investigate the differences in biological characteristics, molecular typing, and pathogenicity to bullfrogs among Streptococcus agalactiae strains from different host sources, providing a theoretical basis for aquaculture disease prevention and control.
      Methods Five frog-derived strains one from Pelophylax nigromaculatus, 14#; four from Rana catesbeiana, 19#, 20#, 24#, 25# and two Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)-derived strains (TW2018-78, TW2021-21) were selected. Species identification was conducted using 16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis and detection of the cfb gene. Further analyses included growth characteristics, capsular polysaccharide (CPS) serotyping, multilocus sequence typing (MLST), virulence and antibiotic resistance gene profiling, and evaluation of pathogenicity to bullfrogs through experimental infection.
      Results All seven strains were identified as S. agalactiae. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that frog- and O. niloticus-derived strains belonged to distinct evolutionary lineages. The frog-derived strains were all of the Ib-ST261 type, optimally grew at 28 °C, and tested negative for both haemolysis and synergistic haemolysis (CAMP test). In contrast, the O. niloticus-derived strains were of the Ia-ST7 type, grew well at 37 °C, and tested positive for β-haemolysis and the CAMP test. Experimental infections showed that strain 25# (frog-derived) was highly pathogenic to bullfrogs, while O. niloticus-derived strains were non-pathogenic. Virulence gene profiling showed that frog-derived strains commonly carried cfb, hylB, and sip, with some also harboring bibA and fbsB, but lacked cylE and bca. O. niloticus-derived strains carried a broader spectrum of virulence genes. Antibiotic resistance gene analysis revealed that frog-derived strains only carried ermA, while O. niloticus-derived strains carried multiple resistance genes including ermA, sul1, qnrS, and pbp2x, with observed inconsistencies between genotype and phenotype.
      Conclusion S. agalactiae strains from different hosts exhibit significant differences in genetic background, physiology, virulence profiles, antimicrobial resistance, and pathogenicity, indicating potential host adaptation. The results of the study provides a theoretical basis for targeted prevention and control strategies of S. agalactiae in aquaculture.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回