基于COⅠ的菲律宾蛤仔养殖与野生群体遗传多样性分析

    Genetic diversity analysis of cultured and wild populations of Ruditapes philippinarum based on COⅠ gene

    • 摘要:背景】菲律宾蛤仔(Ruditapes philippinarum)是东亚地区天然分布的重要双壳贝类之一,在中国被广泛养殖。【目的】旨在对比分析菲律宾蛤仔养殖和野生群体的遗传多样性。【方法】本研究对2个来自福建的养殖群体和3个野生群体(中国莱州、朝鲜南浦和海州),共162个样本的线粒体细胞色素c氧化酶第Ⅰ亚基(COⅠ)基因部分序列进行了扩增和测序分析。【结果】在646 bp的COⅠ基因片段上,5个群体共检测到63个多态变异位点,鉴定出59个单倍型。5个群体的单倍型多样性指数(Hd)为0.880~0.938,核苷酸多样性指数(π)为0.001~0.010。野生群体的单倍型多样性指数为0.905~0.938,核苷酸多样性为0.005~0.010,定义了41个单倍型,占单倍型总数的69.5%。养殖群体的单倍型多样性为0.880~0.902,核苷酸多样性为0.001~0.006,定义了22个单倍型,占单倍型总数的37.3%。分子变异分析(AMOVA)结果显示,菲律宾蛤仔养殖与野生群体间的遗传分化指数为0.23,占总变异的8.13%,但差异不显著(P>0.01);遗传变异主要来源于群体内部个体之间(80.34%,P<0.001);群体间遗传分化系数Fst及遗传距离分析表明,朝鲜和中国群体间的遗传距离存在显著差异(P<0.01),而其他群体间无显著分化(P>0.01)。单倍型分子系统进化树和网络进化图显示,5个群体的单倍型形成了2个遗传分支,但这种遗传分化的形成主要与地理隔离有关。【结论】养殖活动没有显著影响群体的遗传多样性,但相比养殖群体,野生群体呈现了更高的遗传多样性和更多的独享单倍型。这暗示了养殖群体中的遗传多样性的降低可能是缘于较小的有效群体和封闭循环养殖群体中的近交。研究结果有助于未来菲律宾蛤仔养殖活动的合理规划和管理,并为其遗传育种提供理论基础。

       

      Abstract: Background The Manila clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) is one of the important naturally distributed bivalve species in East Asia and is widely cultured in China. Objective This study aims to comparatively analyze the genetic diversity between cultured and wild populations of R. philippinarum. Methods A total of 162 samples from two cultured populations (Fujian, China) and three wild populations (Laizhou, China; Nampo and Haeju, North Korea) were analyzed by amplifying and sequencing a partial segment of the mitochondrial COⅠ gene. Results Within the 646 bp COⅠ gene fragment, a total of 63 polymorphic sites were detected across five populations, defining 59 haplotypes. The haplotype diversity indices (Hd) ranged from 0.880 to 0.938, and nucleotide diversity indices (π) varied between 0.001 and 0.010 among the five populations. Wild populations exhibited haplotype diversity indices of 0.905~0.938 and nucleotide diversity values of 0.005~0.010, with 41 haplotypes identified, accounting for 69.5% of the total haplotypes. Cultured populations showed haplotype diversity of 0.880~0.902 and nucleotide diversity of 0.001~0.006, defining 22 haplotypes, which represented 37.3% of the total haplotypes. AMOVA analysis revealed a low genetic differentiation index (Fst=0.23) between cultured and wild populations, accounting for only 8.13% of the total variation, which was not statistically significant (P>0.01). Most genetic variation (80.34%, P<0.001) originated from differences among individuals within populations. Pairwise Fst and genetic distance analyses indicated significant divergence (P<0.01) between North Korean and Chinese populations, while no significant differentiation was observed among other populations (P>0.01). Phylogenetic trees and network analysis showed that the five populations formed two distinct genetic clusters, primarily influenced by geographic isolation. Conclusion The findings suggest that aquaculture practices have not significantly affected the genetic diversity of R. philippinarum. However, wild populations exhibited higher genetic diversity and more unique haplotypes compared to cultured populations. This implies that the reduced genetic diversity in cultured populations may result from smaller effective population sizes and inbreeding within closed-cycle farming systems. The study provides valuable insights for the sustainable management and genetic breeding of R. philippinarum in future aquaculture.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回